Looking for:
Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Part 2 Ps3 Iso. |
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 & 2 Free Download » STEAMUNLOCKED.
As Harry, Ron and Hermione race against time and evil to destroy the Horcruxes, they uncover the existence of the three most powerful objects in the wizarding world: the Deathly Hallows.
Bellatrix Lestrange : You stupid elf! You could have killed me! Dobby the House Elf : Dobby never meant to kill! Dobby only meant to maim, or seriously injure! Sign In Sign In. New Customer? Create account. Play trailer Adventure Family Fantasy. Director David Yates. Steve Kloves screenplay J.
Rowling novel "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows". Top credits Director David Yates. See more at IMDbPro. Videos Trailer Clip Watch Harry Potter Franchise Retrospective. Watch "Drop Your Wands". Watch "Cafe Attack". Photos Top cast Edit.
Daniel Radcliffe Harry Potter. Emma Watson Hermione Granger. Rupert Grint Ron Weasley. Bill Nighy Minister Rufus Scrimgeour. Richard Griffiths Vernon Dursley. Harry Melling Dudley Dursley. Julie Walters Molly Weasley. Bonnie Wright Ginny Weasley. Ian Kelly Mr. Michelle Fairley Mrs.
Fiona Shaw Petunia Dursley. Alan Rickman Professor Severus Snape. Carolyn Pickles Charity Burbage. Ralph Fiennes Lord Voldemort. Helena Bonham Carter Bellatrix Lestrange. Helen McCrory Narcissa Malfoy. Jason Isaacs Lucius Malfoy. Tom Felton Draco Malfoy. David Yates. More like this. Storyline Edit. Did you know Edit. Trivia Jason Isaacs Lucius Malfoy originally considered not returning for this movie, fearing that his character's arrest and imprisonment at the end of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix would mean very little, if any, screentime in the finale.
Upon meeting J. Rowling , he begged to be let out of prison. She told him "You're out. Chapter one. Goofs at around 1h 28 mins In Harry's flashback of the night his parents were killed, Voldemort is shown in his resurrected form, as opposed to his pre-death state of being. Neither the book nor the movie tell us exactly what Voldemort looked like the night of the Potters' murders. Both, however, allude to his changing appearance becoming less human. Quotes Bellatrix Lestrange : You stupid elf!
Crazy credits The end credits are in 3D gold text. When they conclude, the Deathly Hallows symbol appears, first in extreme close-up with all three items rotating independently like the one Mr. Lovegood wears around his neck , then shrinks down with the title appearing centered across it. Next, the line fades out followed by the circle and, as the triangle fades out, the Elder Wand appears in its place.
User reviews Review. Featured review. Well, the fans asked for it, and they got it. Ever since the release of the first Harry Potter movie in , I've wondered how a TV miniseries of the books would have fared. The movies so far have had difficulties showing enough of the books' events within a reasonable time slot to keep the story flowing. They've all had to omit significant plot points, which has not only disappointed the more literal-minded fans but risked the integrity of the story.
This was most painfully evident in the fifth movie, "Order of the Phoenix," which awkwardly attempted to fit the longest Potter book into just 2 hours and 15 minutes of film.
The result was a movie that felt choppy and barely coherent, almost dreamlike. The two best films up to now--the third and the sixth--worked in part because they took the most risks, often departing substantially from the narrative of the books, to the consternation of many fans. I was not one of the fans complaining, because I figured that as long as it wasn't a miniseries, the best approach was to interpret the story rather than present the events exactly as they appeared in the books.
Dividing the seventh book into two movies has given a taste of what a miniseries might have been like. This surprised me a little, because the portion of Book Seven it covers is actually longer than the entirety of some of the earlier books.
As I was rereading it a few months ago, I correctly guessed where they'd end Part it's at an important turning point in the story that occurs close to the two-thirds mark. Most of the film's sequences are exactly as I had envisioned them, and sometimes better than I had envisioned them. I especially liked its approach to the Riddle-Hermione scene, to the matter of protective enchantments around their camp which is handled with a nice dose of spookiness , and to a spell that distorts a character's face.
Apart from the oversimplification of a few plot details here and there, any flaws in the story come straight from the book. The two-and-half-hour movie drags at some points, but then so did the book, particularly in the forest scenes.
The plot concerns Voldemort's takeover of the wizarding world and pursuit of Harry, who goes into hiding with Ron and Hermione but repeatedly endangers them and himself in his daunting efforts to find and destroy a set of objects that keep Voldemort immortal, aided only by a few enigmatic clues Dumbledore has left him.
It is not a very accessible film for non-fans. People who haven't read or seen any of the previous installments will probably be lost. It never once pauses to explain the Harry Potter universe or anything about the background to these tumultuous events, not even a prologue like the one that began the third of Peter Jackson's "Lord of the Rings" films.
The good news is that it doesn't condescend to the audience. The bad news is that if you don't know or can't remember things like what a horcrux is or what happens when you point a wand at someone and say "Obliviate," you might have trouble following the story. As a fan, however, I loved it. It's just well-filmed, and I had notably fewer complaints about acting and special effects than I had for the previous movies.
The CGI is relatively unobtrusive, and there aren't too many fake-looking moments. The house-elves look especially good this time. Ralph Fiennes finally appears to have settled into the role of Voldemort, after having delivered somewhat phoned-in performances previously. The kids, who get to dominate more scenes than in any of the other films, when their presence was counterbalanced by a plethora of seasoned British performers who are mostly absent here, have really grown into their roles.
They were well-cast from the start and always had a certain raw talent, but early in the series they possessed some of the amateur qualities common to young actors. They have become increasingly proficient as the series has progressed which I suspect was what the studio intended when it eschewed the tradition of casting older actors in child roles. Here they display the kind of camaraderie that can only be developed gradually, after having acted together in several films, and it makes the scenes that deal with their relationship feel natural and unforced.
I actually look forward to seeing the movie again at some point, just so I can sit back and take in more of the details. I think I didn't appreciate it enough the first time, distracted as I was by my knowledge of what happens in the book and the lack of any significant divergence in the film's depiction. There is not a lot in this film that will surprise fans; the enjoyment comes from seeing how vividly it is all brought to life.
Iconic On-Screen Romances From from steamy encounters to comedic couples, these love stories will stand the test of time. FAQ What is the reason that the book is split into two movies? Details Edit. Release date November 19, United States.
United Kingdom United States.
No comments:
Post a Comment